humor

You are currently browsing articles tagged humor.

I’ve got to hand it to Marketing. They’re smart. Even if they screw up sometimes.

A few weeks back, they suggested a new campaign for the novel, all based on price. People will buy anything if you price it cheap enough, they told me, passing across the latest best-selling fiction figures. I scanned the list -- John Locke, Amanda Hocking, Heather Killough Walden -- each of them notching up thousands of $0.99 Kindle sales a week.

That could be you, Alain. Look, readers don’t even like the books much.

They had a point:

‘messy and predictable’
‘I would recommend this book for some mindless poolside reading’
‘a book that contains less than two dozen truly dirty words’
‘Too bad you can’t pick zero stars for the rating.’

If they’re selling thousands, you could be selling millions. All you need to do is come up with the right pitch.

And that’s how my Potato Campaign was born. “Buy my book because it costs less than a large potato.”

But my advisers were wrong. I didn’t sell millions. Or thousands. Or hundreds. Not even tens. It was time for a re-think. So last night, I called a team meeting. Marketing, Editing, the Publisher -- they were all there. It wasn’t going to be easy. Marketing was already looking defensive.

- Guys, the Potato Campaign isn’t working.

- Says who?

- Says me. Here, look at the figures.

The Publisher took off his glasses, polished them carefully, put them back on, and read again. Editing sat low on their chairs, wishing they weren’t there. But Marketing came right back at me, bristling. They weren’t going to take this sort of thing from an author.

- It wasn’t exactly a campaign, was it?

- What do you mean? I did a blog post, didn’t I? “Why I won’t be selling my novel for $495“.

- I don’t hear you saying potato.

- Not in the title, no. But I certainly mentioned potato in the post.

- How many times do we have to tell you? It’s all about keywords. People don’t read posts. They read headlines. You gotta have your keywords in the headline.

- But people don’t care about potatoes.

- They might not care about them, but they eat them, right? Millions of potatoes a day. A potato doesn’t need love. It just needs to be affordable. It needs to be nutritious. And it needs to be there, right there in front of you, every time you step into the food-mart. So where was the potato in your food-mart, Alain?

- I’m sorry?

- How many times did you even mention potato in your blog?

- What, after the first time?

- After the first time.

- I didn’t.

- Well there you are. How do you expect us to help you?

He snapped a pencil in two between his fingers and slammed the pieces onto the desk. No-one breathed. But he wasn’t finished with me yet.

- The problem with you, Alain, is that you give us nothing to work with. We need something that people care about, something they think is important.

- What, like a potato, you mean?

- Forget the friggin’ potato. Like I said, that was just a pitch. No, what we need is less of that Look-at me-I’m-an-author-This-is-literary-fiction bullshit. We need believable characters -- American preferably -- a detective, a hero, a love interest. And maybe you should think about a rewrite for the YA market.

Someone in Editing was trying to catch my eye. There was an almost imperceptible shake of the head. So at least I had their support. I rallied.

- There is a love interest.

- And how does that turn out?

- Bad.

He didn’t even bother to reply. But then a thought came to me.

- Listen, I’ve been reading …

- Oh you’ve been reading again, have you? Sweet.

- Yes. Seth Godin.

With those two magical words, the initiative swung back to me. Show me a marketer in the world who can resist Seth Godin. They snapped to attention, leaned forward across the table, waiting.

- Seth said …

- Yes?

- Seth said: ‘It’s probably true that a low price increases the negative feedback. That’s because a low price exposes the work to individuals that might not be raving fans.’

- And?

- ‘Price is often a signalling mechanism, and perhaps nowhere more than in the area of content.’

We paused to absorb the impact of the words.

- So that means ..?

- That means that if we sell the book at the price of a large potato, readers may come to associate it with a large potato. That’s how we’re signalling it. Useful, convenient, but not an object of desire.

Still Marketing wasn’t convinced.

- But I thought the aim was to maximize the sales of your book. Who said anything about desire? You’re not trying to tell me you want people to read the thing as well, are you?

- That’s exactly what I’m saying. Seth says: ‘Mass shouldn’t always be the goal. Impact may matter more.’

That was the turning-point. Mistakes were forgotten, hostilities put on ice, and we were back working as a team.

- So we need to use price to trigger a different expectation. Not a potato, but …

- Two potatoes?

By this time, we’d clearly left the Publisher lagging some way behind, but our minds were racing.

- An object of desire with a price proposition to match, something our reader wants, longs for at the end of a busy day. Who is this reader, Alain?

- An adult. Gotta be an adult, male or female, probably mid-twenties upward.

- And this adult gets from your book? Remind me, Alain. What do they get? Gimme the words.

- Well … mystery, adventure … a hint of the exotic … humor … excitement … sex … danger … retro …

- I see it! I see it! I think I’ve got it. You know that ad they’re running on TV for the beer … you know the one -- Triple Filtrée … a Smooth Outcome.

- Yeah, I see where you’re coming from. Sixties setting -- the beautiful bored wife -- the suave debonair hero sweeping her away from her husband -- the sexy French overdub. That’s brilliant.

- But guys. My hero’s not suave and debonair.

- No matter. This is advertising. Nothing has to be true. D’you think when you drink the stuff you’re gonna turn into the guy in the ad? Or the girl? It’s not about truth. It’s about aspiration.

- Where are we going with this?

- It’s the price-point, don’t you see? Not a large potato. We sell it for the price of a large beer. And -- God, this is amazing -- that’s our campaign too.

- Go on.

- Triple filtrée. You ever seen a book promoted like that before?

- No, never. Er … maybe, I’m slow but I’m not getting it.

- Triple filtrée. So you say the book’s been edited three times. Not once, not twice, but three times … and now it has less than 3 really dirty words. We might even make it into the YA market, who knows?

This was getting exciting. Next we had to work out how to handle the Smooth Outcome, and we were all busy swapping ideas -- when my wife suddenly popped her head round the door.

- Have you any idea what time it is?

- I’m sorry … were we too loud?

- Oh, is there someone with you?

- Yes. Have you met …

But as I swung back round to the table, they were gone. Every last one of them. Only the broken pencil remained on the table.

- Er, no. It’s just me.

- I worry about you. Don’t you think you should be coming to bed? It’s 2:30.

By daybreak, the new pricing was set, the campaign was in place, and we were ready to go.

That’s the thing about being an indie writer. You can make decisions quickly, change your mind if you’re getting the strategy wrong, implement immediately, call meetings any time of the day or night.

But if you’re doing it at night, just try to keep the noise down.

# # #

The Lebanese Troubles is now available for the price of a large beer. ‘Triple Filtrée … No Smooth Outcome.’

If you’re thinking about buying the book, DON’T. Marketing came up with a few other ideas, which we’ll be announcing here tomorrow. If you can’t wait to get started though, you can now download the first 50% of the novel free at Smashwords. Works on any e-reader or your laptop/PC.

If you can’t wait to get started with Seth Godin, the article is Compared to perfect: the price/value mismatch in content.

And if the story’s just made you thirsty … here’s the next best thing -- for just the price of an e-novel:



Tags: , , , , ,

World-Changing Articles

In 2004-5, two seminal papers changed the way we think about the web, the world, and everything.

Tim O’Reilly’s “What is Web 2.0” explained how the web had become interactive, with dynamic blogs replacing static websites, and readers/users becoming directly involved in the creation and promotion of new products. Proponents of Web 2.0, he said, knew how to “harness collective intelligence” – just the way that Wikipedia does it with literally thousands of volunteers adding, editing and correcting content daily.

Chris Anderson’s article, “The Long Tail“, showed how digital content would change the dynamics of marketing. Since the physical product – a DVD or a book, say – was no longer required, shelf-space effectively became infinite. Which meant goodbye to shelves, goodbye to bricks-and-mortar bookshops, goodbye to ‘out of print’, goodbye to big-publisher control of the market, goodbye to restrictive pricing practices. Later, in a follow-on book, Anderson included charts showing that, while a small number of best-sellers (‘the head’) would continue to dominate the digital market, the new niche products (‘the tail’) would always find buyers, and that the more digital content released, the more we would consume. While the tail didn’t exactly wag the dog, it was far longer than we ever imagined.


The Fourth Dimension

So according to Anderson, it all comes down to dimensional shift. When Length, Width and Depth are no longer a consideration, marketing and the supply-chain evolve. But there was another dimension he didn’t consider. A dimension that never changed. Time.

If I were a mathematician, I’d insert a formula here. But since my mind copes better with images, let me put it this way:

Give a dog a bone and he’ll eat it. Give a dog 5 bones and 2 minutes and he’ll take the easiest bits.

It’s not a perfect analogy. To get it working you’ll have to train your dog to be time-aware and give him a stop-watch. But you see my point, don’t you? That with the torrent of digital material unleashed upon us, and limited time, our consumption patterns were always bound to change. For the marketer, that’s irrelevant. He’ll count what’s easy to count. The number of dogs. The number of bones. Their availability and price. The cost of dog ownership. That’s how we measure our success in the digital economy – with numbers.

Most of us have learnt to go with the flow, whether reading or listening. Certainly my reading habits have changed. I’ve talked elsewhere about ‘greading‘ – the acquisition of more written content than I could possibly consume in a lifetime, just in case someday I might find the time to read it. ‘Headlining’ is another conveniently-packaged reading technique: scanning the latest news or posts, then dropping into the detail to speed-read where something interesting catches the eye. But reading – taking time with words, interpretation, deep understanding … thinking! – well, who’s got the time these days?

Of course there will always be die-hards who try to resist the inevitable. Watch this BBC video clip now and wallow in the nostalgia for a couple of minutes – but don’t forget to come back!

Telling, isn’t it, that they choose to listen on vinyl? Unreconstructed technophobes!


Web ME 2

In recent weeks, a new feature has been springing up all over the web – the Like button. The purpose of the button, as far as I can see, is to eliminate the need to read entirely. Not long ago, I used to get dozens of requests a day to read someone’s blog or book. Doesn’t happen any more. Now people just ask me to Like their work. I have to confess that at first – forward-thinker though I am – I was uncomfortable with this innovation. It seemed so … uncritical somehow. I’m not the sort of person who gets pleasure out of voting people down, and I wrote to a number of the sites offering ‘Like’ to ask if they could also offer an ‘Indifferent’ or ‘Can’t be bothered’ button.

But I’ve given the matter some thought, and I now see ‘Like’ as a very positive development.

First, it’s undoubtedly a time-saver. I’m saving dozens of hours a week not reading material that otherwise might have seemed important.

Second, Liking is deeply embedded in our democratic traditions. Politicians have known for years that what matters is not whether people read or understand their manifestos, but whether they have an opinion about them. The key to a successful election campaign is not sound policy but momentum in the opinion polls, building up an irresistible force of people who Like you. Why should it be any different with a blog or a book?

Third, this is a textbook application of Newtonian physics, as marketing scientists have explained. ‘Every body attracts every other body with a force that is proportional to the mass of each body.’ Thus, the attraction of a blog or a book which has 200 Likes is 100 times greater than the attraction of a book with only 2 Likes.

Look at O’Reilly’s definition again, and you’ll see that we need to redefine it. Web 2.0, it turns out, is not about harnessing collective intelligence, but harnessing collective opinion. ’1000 people say this blog is great. I’ll go along with that.’

Web 2.0 has reinvented itself as Web ME 2.



References

Of course I’m not expecting you to actually read these world-changing articles. But in case you want to gread them, or just Like them, here are the references.

What is Web 2.0? – Tim O’Reilly
The Long Tail – Chris Anderson

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Thumbs-Up

A big thumbs-up to Amazon and Smashwords after they introduced a Like feature recently on their book pages. Many of us are so busy greading that there’s no time any more to read reviews, let alone write them.

What I like about Like is that it requires no thought or time at all. It’s an entirely involuntary reaction, like a smile or a wave. You’re out shopping or running an errand in WebLand: you can’t just stop and chat with everyone you meet, or you’ll never get home. But a Like just lets them know that you’ve seen them, that all’s well with the world, that you’ll get together and catch up sometime – even if you’re busy right now. It makes the world a better place, full of shiny happy people.

But it’s important not read too much into a Like. Just because I Like you, it doesn’t necessarily mean that I want to have your babies. Let me illustrate.

Yesterday was a special day for me, an occasion. As you know, my TwitFace schedule doesn’t allow me a lot of time for getting out. In fact, it was the first time I’d left the house for three months. But I’d been unlocked from my computer chair, and there I was, on the train, heading south, to visit my aged parent.

It was in London that I saw the girl. All the seats were taken, so I stood next to the door, rucksack at my feet, laptop on my shoulder. I scanned the passengers, reading newspapers, text-messages, ads, thrillers. I made a mental note. Write in 15-minute segments: aim for the commuter-market. ‘Short is more’.

But she was different. She was reading on a Kindle. I Liked that. Maybe she sensed it. She glanced up. I let her know. Thumbs-up and a smile.

I sensed her coloring as she went back to her reading. Perhaps it was my book! What a coincidence that would have been. Did she look like one of my readers? Did my readers look like her? As our eyes touched again, I gave her two thumbs-up.

She turned to the guy on the seat next to her, and whispered. He looked at me, curious, rose. We’d connected.

- Hey man, why you coming on to my woman?
- No, not coming on. I was just Liking her.
- You gotta be kidding me.
- I thought maybe we could be friends.

Well, clearly he wasn’t a Facebook user. Fortunately it wasn’t too long before the next stop, and although not having my glasses meant I couldn’t post last night, I’ve been able to get a new pair this morning. So no permanent damage, only bruising.

I never did manage to ask if it was my book she was reading.


References

If you’re a commuter-reader, you might Like 40kBooks and eCapris, thinking of people like you.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Uncle Sam

On my lecture tours in Europe and the rest of the developing world, I constantly remind bloggers how important it is to make friends with Americans. The US, you see, is the cultural hub of the universe (- the precise epicenter is said to be just west of Hannibal, Mo).

We writers, in particular, stand in awe of the achievements of our American cousins. Take the mighty Amazon, for example (- what humility, not to call it Mississippi!): over 900,000 books in their US online store. (In their UK equivalent, by comparison, the number was 25, the last time I bothered to check.) And what writers! The likes of Stephenie Meyer, James Patterson, and now Amanda Hocking – living testaments to their culture. Most of our British writers are dead.

But it’s one thing to give advice: another to get followed by our trans-Atlantic cousins. To be honest, Americans don’t Like me much.

That’s why I was delighted to find today a wonderfully informative guide from New York University, Getting to Know Americans. In just a few minutes, I found out exactly where I was going wrong.

Now at this point, non-American readers, I’m afraid I’m going to have to ask you to leave. Because one of the first tips is to ‘spend time away from your compatriots to be with Americans’. Yes, I’m sorry. Just leave. Now! I need a little privacy here … well I don’t know, do I? … try another of the 30 million blogs out there, maybe? … AND YOU!

Right, sorry about that, but I think they’ve gone now. So let’s get down to business, shall we? Have I told you about my novel? (“Another expectation is that people are ready to ‘do business’ very soon after meeting, without much time spent on preliminary conversation.”)

Oh. We haven’t been introduced? Well, you can call me Al. (“Adults in the majority culture routinely use each other’s first names upon introduction.”)

No, from England actually. You’ve heard of it? Little island – west side of Europe. No, Europe … near Russia. Yes. Thames River, Big Ben, Parliament Building, stiff upper lip … yes, that’s it, Hugh Grant. (“Be patient if Americans are ignorant of some aspect about your home country. Use the opportunity to educate and share, just do so in a polite and brief manner.” – if you’re still struggling to place England, you may find this American writer’s description helpful.)

So, anyway, about my book … Oh, you write too, do you? Baseball thrillers? Sounds exciting. Yes, I adore baseball. Babe Ruth, eh? What a player! Joe DiMaggio. Joltin’ Joe! Marilyn Monroe. (“Know what topics Americans like to discuss. These usually include music, clubs, movies, sports, and vacation plans.”)

No, not much baseball in my book. None, really. I would have liked to, of course, but it was difficult to get a team together with just one … American in the story … but all the spelling’s American though. I wanted it to be right for your market. (“Americans often think that other countries should use their example and adopt their ways of doing things.”)

I’m working on a new vampire edition too – specially for US readers. New characters, a great new cover, and I’m raising the price to $5.99. (“Not only is the amount or worth of the material items valued, but there is often a priority on obtaining the latest version. The United States is a culture that tends to view change as good, as an improvement.”) Does your book have vampires?

No, I can see that might not work. You’re number 5 in sports novels on Amazon, you say? Up for Baseball Thriller of the Year? That’s wonderful! No, no awards really, not for books anyway. I did once get a swimming certificate. Oh, and I won the Pterodactyl award from the British Software Industry in 1990. A special award for my success in sending the industry into reverse. (“People act competitively, are proud of their accomplishments and expect others to be proud of their own accomplishments.”)

So can I interest you in a copy of my book? I see. Not enough Americans. No baseball. Right. Well, what about taking a look at my blog then? Perhaps I could get you to do a guest spot on baseball? (“Persevere through the disappointments with superficial interactions.”)

Yes, we’re very relaxed over there at Writers without Borders. Most of the time I write my posts, I’m sitting there working in my pyjamas pajamas. (“There’s a trend towards ‘dressing down’, that is, informally, in the workplace on Fridays and for Christian church services during the summer.”)

And I think you’d like the atmosphere over there. I’m proud that it’s an equal opportunity blog. (“Although there are many differences in social, economic, and educational levels in the United States, there is a theme of equality that runs through social relationships”) Anyone can write in and comment, even women. (“There is a strong feminist movement in the United States that aims to insure that women have responsibilities and opportunities equal to those of men.”) You know, one of my best friends was once a woman.

But hey, why are we just sitting here talking? Why don’t I get tickets for the Yankees-Red Sox match tonight, and we can carry on this discussion there? (“Rather than simply getting together with friends to spend time together, Americans will frequently plan an activity – any activity – and will tend not to get together without some focus to the time spent with friends.”)

Oh, you’ve already got plans? Well some other time then.

Yes, I’d be delighted to be your Facebook friend. (“Americans tend to ‘compartmentalize’ their friendships, having their ‘friends at work’, ‘friends at school’, a ‘tennis friend’, and so on.”)

And of course I’ll Like your book.

Notes:

(Unfortunately, as I was proof-reading this post, I found that the original source-article had disappeared from the NYU site. I’ll keep looking for it, and repost the link if it reappears.)

If I’ve whetted your appetite for a baseball thriller, then check out the well-reviewed Allen Schatz novel – Game 7: Dead Ball – and just to clarify, Alan and I did not
have the conversation described above. :)

Don’t miss the earlier TwitFace posts:
The TwitFace Plan
7 Health and Safety Tips for Bloggers
Donate a family. Save a writer!

Tags: , , , ,

A Declining Resource

I’ve had my concerns about blogging of course. Who hasn’t?

What is the impact on the planet, when every day millions of us use thousands of words, almost without thinking, as if the supply was never-ending?

There are those who claim that the word is a re-usable resource, and that we have enough words to last the next 100 years … by then, they say, we’ll have discovered new channels of communication. But my private research indicates an approaching crisis: each time a word is used, it loses a fraction of its original lustre and intensity, gradually diminishing until it becomes a meaningless black hole.

Here’s the evidence. In just 50 years, the life-expectancy of words has been reduced by a factor of 4. In the 1950s, the average reader struggled to understand Shakespeare and the King James Bible, but was comfortable with Dickens – so words had a half-life of about 200 years. For most of today’s readers, Dickens is impenetrable – and that’s a half-life of not much more than 50 years.

My fear is that with the explosive growth of blogging and the uncontrolled use of words, the rate of decay will accelerate until, in a matter of a few years, words will become meaningless even before they are written. All blogs – and even tweets – would be reduced to unintelligible mumbo-jumbo.

My Conservation Efforts

As a writer and blogger therefore, I feel I have a responsibility to the planet – to plant a new word for every thousand I consume. You may have noticed ‘macronym’ yesterday – an acronym using two or three letters of each word instead of just the initial; my example was ‘NaPoWriMo‘ – National Poetry Writing Month.

Here’s my contribution for today.


gread [gri:d] verb transitive or intransitive | p. gread [gred] | pp. gread [gred]

sounds like ‘breed’, ‘seed’

to download, subscribe to, or otherwise acquire large quantities of free or low-cost digital content without reading it.

e.g. “I’ve just tweeted all 50 blogs I’ve gread today.”

Derivation: a construct from the English words ‘greed’ and ‘read’



Greading: The Danger to Writers

If you thought word-decay was a problem, greading is a potential catastrophe. Because it kills writers and bloggers. Kills them with kindness.

This is how it goes. Annie joins a group including 200 other bloggers. Filled with optimism and good intentions, she tweets everyone in the group, subscribes to their blogs. Many of them reciprocate, and for the first few days, Annie’s on a high. But following the TwitFace Plan, her days are filled, and there’s no time to keep up with her new friends. Day by day, there are fewer responses, and before long, she’s writing mainly for her own pleasure once again, not anyone else’s.

Ed’s a writer determined to connect with as many readers as possible, so he decides to eliminate all price barriers to his novel. He’s interested, he says, in engaging with readers for the long term. Making money isn’t important right now. He offers his work for free, and is delighted with the sudden response. His books are ‘selling’ like never before. He waits a week or two for the reviews and the praise to start flowing. But they don’t. Because his books have been downloaded with hundreds of others, and the first page has never been opened.

For anyone who writes, only two things are important. Coffee and Attention. (I suppose I could add Money too, but if that’s a primary interest, you might do better getting a job in publishing, or setting up as an agent.)

A few weeks later Annie is playing Farmville; Ed has taken up online gambling. Hopes raised, then dashed – because of greading.

Another TwitFace Solution

But, my fellow TwitFacers, never fear. Now we’ve named the problem, we can understand it. And with understanding comes the solution. A distinctively TwitFace solution, which will benefit you, your family and the world community of writers.

Here’s the issue, you see: when everyone’s a writer, nobody’s a reader. We’re all just greaders. That’s all there’s time for. Tell me, truthfully. Are you a real reader, or a blogger making the effort to read? Aren’t you a greader too? Not just a little?

So here we all are, greading furiously. 30 million bloggers and 1 million writers … but wait! That’s not everyone! What about the other 6,878,887,629 people who don’t blog or write? Perhaps they’re not all your LinkedIn or Facebook friends, or you may not feel able to influence them … so let’s set our aims lower. What about the other 2.14 members of your own household? (Figures may vary – our household was me + 2.75 people last time I checked – but 3.14 people per household is the official average.)

You may remember that in my recent Health and Safety post, I introduced Standard Operating Procedures to minimize interruptions to your important work. I explained how effective Signage could help you maintain concentration even in a high-traffic area. But what better way to energize your working environment and silence your family members than putting them to work too – not as writers, but as readers? While you’re busy with the Ultimate Blog Challenge, why could they not be involved with NaDoFaSaWriMo? (That’s National Donate Your Family To Save A Writer Month – in case you haven’t figured it out. Aren’t macronyms a joy?)

Think what we could achieve. If you donated your 2.14 family members and each family member befriended 30 bloggers for a month, commenting on their posts every two days, you could singlehandedly support Annie and Ed and 60 other bloggers – who’d get dozens of comments a day. Greading would be unnecessary because bloggers would stay busy writing, not pretending to read. Your working hours would be significantly shorter, and disturbances significantly fewer.

We would of course need to insist that all bloggers supported by the scheme should plant a new word each day, in order to sustain and replenish the existing stock. But I can’t see why any blogger should object to that.

So if you’re as excited about this scheme as I am, why not donate your family today, by signing up below?

And to get things started, let’s see who can come up with the best caption for Ed’s photo, to encourage others to join TwitFace’s NaDoFaSaWriMo initiative – and save our bloggers and writers. There’s a prize for the most persuasive entry: a week’s worth of comments on your blog.

No greading!



Earlier posts in the TwitFace project:

The TwitFace Plan
7 Health & Safety Tips for Bloggers

Tags: , , , , ,



Is there a sextant in your
blogger’s toolkit? No?
Then you’d better read on.


It all started with Geoffrey Chaucer, who wrote:

Whan that Aprille with his shoures soote
The droghte of Marche hath perced to the roote ….
Than longen folk to goon on pilgrimages …

Yes, his spelling was terrible, but what do you expect from a self-published author? Anyway, the point is that April was a time when people started making plans to go off on pilgrimage. And why? Well, if you’re familiar with The Canterbury Tales, you’ll know that the whole point of pilgrimage was meeting up with friends and strangers to swap stories. Tall stories, comic stories, bawdy stories, moral stories … everyone got into the act. There was just something in the air.

600 years later, we’re still telling stories in April – except that now, there’s none of that unpleasant walking. You can join any number of tour-groups from the comfort of your own PC, laptop, tablet or web-enabled phone. There’s the Ultimate Blog Challenge – where pilgrims pledge to write 30 posts in 30 days. Or the slightly less arduous A-Z Blogging Challenge for all 26 days of April ( – quite properly, they discount the Sabbath). Or, if like Chaucer, the Muse moves you to burst out into poetry, there’s NaPoWriMo (- I know! But these macronyms are popular in the US, they tell me).

If you haven’t started yet, and you’d like to join, it’s not too late. You can still catch up with us.

Now although we have none of the physical hardships of Chaucer’s tale-tellers, we should remember T.S Eliot’s warning – that ‘April is the cruellest month’. I was reminded of that this morning when I read the tale of plucky fellow-pilgrim, Raven Howard. Injured in Spring Training, put on the disabled list, and missing the start of the season, Raven has decided to make up for her enforced inactivity by accepting the Ultimate Blog Challenge. It’s a wise decision: in my experience, the perfect way to warm up for a prolonged period of inactivity is to commit yourself to writing a blog, backed up of course by all the normal TwitFace support activities.

But blogging can still be dangerous. Why, only last night I fell off my chair after falling asleep at the keyboard – and I hadn’t taken precautions. Like Raven, I could have had a nasty injury. So, since there are so many inexperienced bloggers joining us at the beginning of this pilgrimage season, it seemed a good time to give you …

THE TWITFACE GUIDE TO HEALTH AND SAFETY

1. A quiet, secure working area

Your job is demanding and requires the utmost concentration. Exposure to noise and frequent interruption while blogging causes stress, and may even result in a missed retweet or direct message. Ideally you should set up your workspace in an area removed from normal family life. But if you choose to work under the stairs or in a cupboard, make sure that there is adequate ventilation and lighting. If your only option is to work in a high-traffic area, then follow the directions in note 2 carefully.

2. Signage

Make sure that working areas are clearly demarcated and signed, and that instructions are clear and precise. ‘Genius at work’ is an example of a particularly bad sign, since it gives no indication of how the reader is supposed to behave. It may also cause precisely the disruption that you are trying to avoid. More effective are: ‘Keep out!’, ‘Silence!’, or ‘Go Away!’. Your signs need to be prominently displayed. If you are working in a high-traffic area, I have found it effective to pin signs to your headgear or writer’s jacket (as described below).

3. Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs)

In my previous post, I demonstrated how to create a successful TwitFace Plan (and I’ve been delighted to hear that so many of you have found my schedule a useful template). But as well as micro-planning your own work, it’s important to define Standard Operating Procedures for other members of your household, and then to make sure that they understand and buy in to the plan. For example, there needs to be total clarity about when you may be interrupted. If the kitchen’s on fire or your spouse is having a nervous breakdown, at what point should you be notified, and what are the escalation procedures? For a deeper understanding of SOPs, please refer to the excellent post from fellow-pilgrim, Shilpa Venkateshwaran.

4. Ergonomics


Wanna end up looking like this?
The use that sextant!

Musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) are common in TwitFacers, due to poor chair and desk positioning. When setting up your workspace, check that your seating position, knees and elbows are all at a 90 degree angle, as shown not shown in the illustration. Beginners are then advised to check and if necessary recalibrate their positions every 15 minutes using a sextant. (For approximate angles, a spirit level may suffice – but it looks unprofessional.)

5. Clothing (The Writer’s Jacket)



(Back view)

Some time ago, my wife bought me the rather attractive jacket pictured – but until recently we’d never found a use for it. Now I’m a TwitFacer, it’s an important part of my writing equipment. Light, comfortable, it allows me to buckle or chain myself to the chair to prevent falls. There’s one small disadvantage: if chained in, you need a second person to release you. Earlier this week I was locked into my chair for three days before anyone noticed I was missing. That’s why I decided not to wear it last night – with disastrous consequences. A well-written SOP can help to prevent family oversights.

6. Protective Headgear

TwitFacers debate the best type of headgear for a writer. Some prefer the extra protection of a cycling helmet. I prefer a beanie, more comfortable and, in my view, sufficient to minimize damage to the skull in most writing-related accidents. I find it difficult to imagine that I could fall head-first from my chair, although encounters with the desk are not infrequent, particularly in late-night sessions.

7. Work-Life Balance

Don’t let social media take over your whole life. Remember there’s a real world out there too. Every so often, when you need a break, why not pull up the Sudoko screen, or play a couple of hands of Hearts?

Follow these guidelines and I’m sure you’ll find that blogging is an enjoyable and fulfilling experience.

Have I missed anything important? If you have any other great tips and advice, let me know, and we’ll add them to the list.

Tags: , , , , ,

Newer entries »

close